Couple Freed After Alleged Anti-Semitic Vandalism Causes $20,000 Damage in Sydney
Couple released after alleged anti-Semitic attacks in wealthy suburb
A Sydney couple has been released from custody after appearing in court over their alleged involvement in a series of anti-Semitic attacks across one of the city’s wealthiest suburbs. The incidents, which caused an estimated $20,000 in damages, involved the torching of a car and graffiti targeting Jewish communities.
Emotional court hearing via video link
Tammie Farrugia, 34, and Scott Marshall, 36, were visibly emotional as they reunited via video link during their hearing at Downing Centre Local Court. The pair were previously under scrutiny for an unrelated explosives-laden caravan in Dural, though no charges were laid in that matter.
Hate crimes occurred in Woollahra on December 11
The main incident occurred on December 11 in Woollahra, where a car was set ablaze and two buildings were spray-painted with hate speech. The graffiti included the disturbing phrase, “Kill Israiel”, incorrectly spelled but unmistakably anti-Semitic in nature.
Facebook post about jerry cans tied to case
Court records revealed that Farrugia allegedly posted online the day before the incident, asking for plastic jerry cans. “Anyone got any plastic Jerry cans plz let me know thanks in advance,” she allegedly wrote in a Facebook group. This post became part of the prosecution’s case.
Court states couple unknowingly aided the crime
During the hearing, the court acknowledged that the couple did not orchestrate the attack. Magistrate Susan McIntyre stated, “They have unfortunately been used to gather the fuel cans and move the vehicle and they did that without any knowledge of what was to occur thereafter.”
Participation enabled anti-Semitic vandalism
Despite their limited role, McIntyre emphasized their participation enabled the attack. She remarked, “Ultimately I suppose for the participation of Ms Farrugia and Mr Marshall, the activity of the antisemitic actions would not have occurred.”
Couple claimed ignorance of planned arson
The couple claimed they were unaware of the vehicle’s intended use until they saw the incident broadcast on television. Their arrest led to speculation about their involvement in a separate Dural caravan plot, which included a list of Jewish addresses. However, police later cleared them of any connection.
Legal counsel denies conspiracy involvement
According to Farrugia’s legal representative, “Ms Farrugia and Mr Marshall were not part of any antisemitic conspiracy or activity and are not linked in any way to a caravan found on the street in Dural.” The Australian Federal Police concluded it was a fake terrorism plot.
Marshall sentenced to jail for property destruction
Marshall pleaded guilty to destroying or damaging property and taking a vehicle without consent. He was sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment, with a non-parole period of six months starting from December 24, 2024. A charge for participating in a criminal group was dropped.
Farrugia receives community-based sentence
Farrugia also pleaded guilty to similar charges and was released under a 12-month Community Corrections Order (CCO). She is now subject to supervision, required to abstain from drugs, and must attend intervention and treatment programs under the CCO’s terms.
Emotional display during remote court session
In an emotional moment during the AVL court appearance, Farrugia lifted her shirt in front of the camera and both she and Marshall said, “I love you,” reuniting after months apart.
Payment offer for fuel remains unclear
The alleged text message offering payment for jerry cans sent to Marshall remains a point of interest, though whether the couple received money remains unclear. His involvement also violated a prior bail condition tied to a drug court matter.
Court highlights impact of their assistance
The court recognized their secondary role in the incident but emphasized the gravity of their involvement, noting the damage would not have occurred without their assistance in acquiring the fuel and moving the vehicle.
Case underscores risks of unwitting involvement
While both now face a future under legal scrutiny and correctional oversight, their case has highlighted the thin line between unwitting assistance and criminal facilitation, particularly in hate-related crimes.
